THE NAVAL CADETS’ EVALUATION MODEL: A FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATION OF THE COACHING SYSTEM

Abstract

In order to realize Superior Human Resources, X Naval Academy builds an education system that is oriented to the Tri Archetype of Armed Force Education, namely through Teaching, Training and Nurturing Methods that cannot be separated from one another. There are still problems in its implementation, it is necessary to carry out an evaluation for the development of the AAL Cadet Development system with a Dynamic Systems Approach and Game Theory to compare with the International Naval Academy in this case NDA and USNA. The simulation data uses data from the last 5 years, namely the period 2017 to 2022. The results of the study are that there are 2 key variables that have a significant effect in the Cadet Development System, namely Additional Night Activities and Additional Protocol Activities, then simulated Optimistic Scenarios, Moderate Scenarios and Pessimistic Scenarios. The most Optimal Scenario results are the Optimistic Scenario which can increase the Graduate Quality Value from 0.25 "Sufficient" to 0.63 "Good", the Teaching Quality Value from 0.32 "Sufficient" to 0.71 "Good", the Training Quality Value from 0.2 "Less" to 0.52 "Good" and the Nurturing Quality Value of 0.17 "Less" becomes 0.47 "Sufficient", then the results of the Scenario are analyzed with the Game Theory Two Persons Zero Sum Game approach by comparing with the situation in NDA and USNA, the results of the analysis produce Policy suggestions namely X Naval Academy regulates the time to face Junior Cadets to Senior Cadets in Daily Activity and regulates Technical Facing as has been applied in NDA and USNA to To avoid missing nightly rest and deviations from undirected and measurable coaching, X Naval Academy screens and advises leaders on priority scales in support of unscheduled protocol activities involving cadets. This has been implemented in NDA and USNA.

Keywords: Cadets, Game Theory, Naval Academy, NDA, System dynamics, USNA